Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Digital Audit Practices in the Public Sector of Different Countries

  • Norsyahida Mokhtar International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Hawa Ahmad International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Suhaiza Ismail International Islamic University Malaysia


Purpose: The objectives of this paper are two-fold: first, it presents a bibliometric study on digital audit in the public sector of different countries; and Second, it provides review of prior studies on digital audit implementation by governments in various countries.

Design/ Methodology/ Approach: There are two parts in the present study, and both use secondary data. The first part is a bibliometric study of past literature on digital audit in the public sector which was carried out to provide an overview of trend of publications over the last 30 years, citation analysis in terms of top cited journals and articles, as well as author analysis which covers most active single author and author with co-authorship and based on the country of the authors. The second part of the paper uses the content analysis technique on prior literature to extract and compile information on digital audit practices by the public sector of various countries in terms of the year of implementation, current status of implementation, and modules and the software used.

Findings: The results of the first of the study indicate the increasing trend of publications on digital audit in the public sector which are authored by researchers from many countries. This implies the current trend of digital audit movement by governments around the world. For the second part, the review on digital audit practices of governments in different countries reveals several European countries such as Norway, Ukraine and Germany are championing digital audit in the public sector although none of the countries has full-fledged implementation. Most countries started with taxation audit, and are now having labs or incubators for full-fledged digital audit experimentation in the public sector.

Originality/ Value: The findings of this paper are important due to the followings: (1) it offers insightful evidence into the current development and direction of digital audit research, which ultimately calls for more research efforts on digital audit in the public sector; (2) the information on digital audit practices by several European countries provides essential guidance to the governments of other countries including Malaysia to better prepare for its successful more advanced digital audit implementation journey.


*Ahmad, A., Saad, M., Al Ghamdi, M., Nyang, D., & Mohaisen, D. (2021). Blocktrail: A service for secure and transparent blockchain-driven audit trails. IEEE Systems Journal, 16(1), 1367-1378.

Al-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., & Hameed, K. (2018). Key issues for embracing the cloud computing to adopt a digital transformation: A study of Saudi public sector. Procedia Computer Science, 130(7), 1037-1043.

*Alenizi, A. S. (2020). A systematic literature review for understanding the antecedents of the digital open government matrix. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 16(1), 1-17.

*Alkan, B. Ş. (2022). How blockchain and artificial intelligence will effect the cloud-based accounting information systems?. In The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Governance, Economics and Finance, 2 (pp. 107-119). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

*Agostino, D., Bracci, E., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Accounting and accountability for the digital transformation of public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 145-151.

*Antipova, T. (2017). Fraud prevention by government auditors. 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Lisbon, Portugal, 2017, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.23919/CISTI.2017.7976024

*Antipova, T. (2018). Using blockchain technology for government auditing. In 2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

*Antipova, T. (2019). Organizational model for public sector auditing bearingin mind time factor. In Advances in Tourism, Technology and Smart Systems. Proceedings of ICOTTS 2019 (pp. 297-305). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-15-2024-2_27

*Antipova, T. (2019). Digital public sector auditing: A look into the future. Quality-Access to Success, 20, 441-446.

*Antipova, T. (2019). Public sector performance auditing. In 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi. org/10.23919/ CISTI.2019.8760933

*Aquino, A. C. B. D., Lino, A. F., & Azevedo, R. R. D. (2021). The embeddedness of digital infrastructures for data collection by the Courts of Accounts. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33, 46-62.

*Aquino, A. C. B. D., Lino, A. F., Azevedo, R. R. D., & Silva, P. B. D. (2022). Digital affordances and remote public audit practice. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(3), 447-467.

Audit Scotland. (2017). Digital Audit Strategy 2017: Supporting world-class audit. Retrieved March 29, 2023, from: document/ 444209821/Digital- Audit-Strategy-2017#

Azzone, G. (2018). Big data and public policies: Opportunities and challenges. Statistics and Probability Letters, 136, 116-120.

*Balkrishna, A., Mittal, R., Kumar, A., Singh, D., & Arya, V. (2020). Analysis of policy interventions in agriculture and ICT based mechanistic approach towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 10(1), 194-213.

*Bansod, S., & Ragha, L. (2020, June). Blockchain technology: Applications and research challenges. In 2020 International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

*Barrett AO, P. (2022). New development: Whither the strategic direction of public audit in an era of the ‘new normal’?. Public Money & Management, 42(2), 124-128.

Bezverkhyi, K. (2021). Normatyvno-pravove ta informatsiino-analitychne zabezpechennia vprovadzhennia e-audytu v Ukraini [Regulatory and legal and informational and analytical support for the implementation of e-audit in Ukraine]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia ekonomichna–Bulletin of Lviv University. Economy Series, 60, 105-115.

Bezverkhyi K., & Poddubna N. (2023). Prerequisites for the implementation of e-audit in Ukraine. Scientia Fructuosa, 2, 92-104.

*Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M., & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 167-182.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.

*Drivas, G., Maglaras, L., Janicke, H., & Ioannidis, S. (2019, July). Cybersecurity assessment of the public sector in Greece. In ECCWS 2019 18th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (p. 162). Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.

ECA Journal. (2020). Big data & digital audits. No. 1 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2023, from ecadocuments/ journal20_01/journal20_01.pdf

Elsevier. (2023). Accessed on 13 March 2023.

*Flores, D. A. (2014, April). An authentication and auditing architecture for enhancing security on egovernment services. In 2014 First International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 73-76). IEEE.

*Ferry, L., Radcliffe, V. S., & Steccolini, I. (2022). The future of public audit. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(3), 325-336.

*Gable, G. G., & Davis, G. B. (1993, December). EDP auditor: Disappearing or adapting. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC11 9th International Conference on Information Security (pp. 253-266). Elsevier Science Publishers BV.

*Gillpatrick, T., Boğa, S., & Aldanmaz, O. (2022). How can blockchain contribute to developing country economies? A literature review on application areas. Economics, 10(1), 105-128.

*Hardin-Ramanan, S. (2020). A Mauritian case study of IT governance and green IT. In Sustainability Awareness and Green Information Technologies (pp. 257-269). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

*Huy, P. Q., & Phuc, V. K. (2023). Unfolding sustainable auditing ecosystem formation path through digitalization transformation: How digital intelligence of accountant fosters the digitalization capabilities. Heliyon, 9(2). e13392

IBM. (2021). Assessed on 30 March 2023. Refining Data. iis/11.7?topic=projects-refining-data

*Imam, I. T., Arafat, Y., Alam, K. S., & Shahriyar, S. A. (2021, February). DOC-BLOCK: A blockchain based authentication system for digital documents. In 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV) (pp. 1262-1267). IEEE. ICICV50876.2021.9388428

Kelly, R. (2020). How data analytics can help with audits. Retrieved May 5, 2022, from:

Korol, V., Dmytryk, O., Karpenko, O., Riadinska, V. O., Basiuk, O., Kobylnik, D., & Mishchenko, T. (2022). Elaboration of recommendations on the development of the state internal audit system when applying the digital technologies. Eastern- European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(13), 39-48.

Kostiantyn, B., & Yulia, L. (2021). Development of digital audit in the Countries of the European Union. Рекомендовано до друку на засіданні Вченої ради Факультету інформаційних технологій та управління Київського університету імені Бориса Грінченка протокол № 10 від 17.11. 2021 року, 68.

Lardo, A., Corsi, K., Varma, A., & Mancini, D. (2022). Exploring blockchain in the accounting domain: a bibliometric analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9).

Lazarevska, Z. B., Tocev, T., & Dionisijev, I. (2022). How to improve performance in public sector auditing through the power of big data and data analytics?-The case of the Republic of North Macedonia. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 8(3), 187-209.

*Li, T., & Liu, C. (2010, May). Data “audit” research based on the accounting information system. In 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 2416-2419). IEEE.

*Liu, Z., Yang, A., Zeng, H., Jiang, C., & Ma, L. (2023). A generalized block chain-based government data sharing protocol. Security and Communication Networks. https://

Lois, P., Drogalas, G., Karagiorgos, A., & Tsikalakis, K. (2020). Internal audits in the digital era: Opportunities risks and challenges. EuroMed Journal of Business. https://doi. org/10.1108/EMJB-07-2019-0097

*Loukis, E., & Spinellis, D. (2001). Information systems security in the Greek public sector. Information Management & Computer Security, 9(1), 21-31. https://doi. org/10.1108/09685220110366740

*Lyudmila, P., & Anzhela, H. (2022). Main directions for improving public administration mechanisms in Ukraine. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(8), 41-48.

Moffitt, K. C., Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Robotic process automation for auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15(1), 1-10.

*Mosweu, O., & Ngoepe, M. (2019). Skills and competencies for authenticating digital records to support audit process in Botswana public sector. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 29(1), 17-28.

*Mosweu, O., & Ngoepe, M. (2021). Trustworthiness of digital records in government accounting system to support the audit process in Botswana. Records Management Journal, 31(1), 89-108.

*Nakale, B., & Chikohora, E. (2020, November). Towards a data-driven innovation business model in digital government services in Namibia: A survey. In 2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

*Nalçacı, İ. G. (2017, October). Implemention of Benford analysis for electronic invoice audit. In 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) (pp. 1036-1040). IEEE.

*Nedyalkova, P. (2020). Evaluation as a means of assessing the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of internal audit. Quality of Internal Auditing in the Public Sector: Perspectives from the Bulgarian and International Context, 47-57. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-29329-1_5

Noël, F. (2020, February 18). IT audit at the ECA - Assessing the digital environment in policy areas. Medium.

*Otia, J. E., & Bracci, E. (2022). Digital transformation and the public sector auditing: The SAI’s perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 252-280.

Podik, I. I., Shtuler, I. Y., & Gerasymchuk, N. A. (2019). The comparative analysis of tax audit files. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(30), 147-156. DOI:10.18371/fcaptp.v3i30.179525

*Rana, T., Steccolini, I., Bracci, E., & Mihret, D. G. (2022). Performance auditing in the public sector: A systematic literature review and future research avenues. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(3), 337-359.

*Rolo, L. C. P. (2016). Sistema de gestão e auditoria fiscal na nuvem (Doctoral dissertation).10.18803/capsi.v15.326-337

*Rosenbaum, M. S., Walters, G., Edwards, K. L., & Gonzalez-Arcos, C. F. (2022). Commentary: The unintended consequences of digital service technologies. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(2), 97-109.

*Rukanova, B., Tan, Y. H., Hamerlinck, R., Heijmann, F., & Ubacht, J. (2021). Digital infrastructures for governance of circular economy: A research agenda. EGOV-CeDEM-ePart-*,191-198.

*Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680.

*Santos, P. M., Bernardes, M. B., Rover, A. J., & Mezzaroba, O. (2013). Ranking dos tribunais de contas brasileiros: Uma avaliação a partir dos padrões web em governoeletrônico. Revista de Administração Pública, 47, 721-744. S0034-76122013000300009

*Shah, S. M., & Khan, R. A. (2020). Secondary use of electronic health record: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Access, 8,136947-136965.

*Sharma, R. (2018). Steps for implementing big data and its security challenges. Data Intensive Computing Application for Big Data, 29.

*Soverchia, M., & Fradeani, A. (2018). The extensible business reporting language: A digital tool to enhance public sector accountability. In Innovative perspectives on public administration in the digital age(pp.106-120). IGI Global.

*Tian, Z. (2020, July). Design and implementation of distributed government audit system based on multidimensional online analysis. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems (ICPICS) (pp. 981-983). IEEE. ICPICS50287.2020. 9202396

Tiberius, V., & Hirth, S. (2019). Impacts of digitization on auditing: A Delphi study for Germany. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 37, 100288.

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman. L. (2023). VOSviewer Manual. Volkova, N., Kuzmuk, I., Oliinyk, N., Klymenko, I., & Dankanych, A. (2021). Developmenttrends of the digital economy: e-business, e-commerce.

*Xi, W., Wenbing, L., Qiaoyun, X., & Junhui, L. (2021, October). Research on digital audit of electric waste materials based on big data platform. In 2021 IEEE 5th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC) (Vol. 5, pp. 1497-1500). IEEE.

*Xu, C., Chen,Y., Ge, H., & He, Y. (2020). Audit technology research based on big data. Acta Electronica Sinica, 48(5), 1003-1017.

*Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhu, L., Chen, G., & Zhang, H. (2022). Digital technology enables modernization of national statistics. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version),37(12), 1738-1744.

*Ziyadin, S., Malayev, K., Fernández-Plazaola, I., Ismail, G., & Beyzhanova, A. (2020). Digital modernization of the system of public administration: Prerogatives and barriers. In E3S Web of conferences (Vol. 159, p. 05003). EDP Sciences.
How to Cite
MOKHTAR, Norsyahida; AHMAD, Hawa; ISMAIL, Suhaiza. Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Digital Audit Practices in the Public Sector of Different Countries. IPN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 37-60, dec. 2023. ISSN 2682-9347. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 30 may 2024.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.