Kesediaan Guru Sejarah Sekolah Rendah dalam Mengaplikasikan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi dalam Mata Pelajaran Sejarah

Vanitha Muniandy; Anuar Ahmad; Norasmah Othman

Vanitha Muniandy SELANGOR
Anuar Ahmad
Norasmah Othman

Abstract

Higher-level thinking skills (HTS) is a transformation in the education system in Malaysia in this century in line with the implementation of the Malaysian Education Development Plan (PPPM) 2013-2025. The teaching practice that applies KBAT has gone beyond the entire concept of subject content by focusing on several theories of KBAT, particularly Bloom's and Lorin Anderoson's taxonomy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify teachers' readiness from the aspects of knowledge, skills and attitudes in applying Higher Level Thinking Skills (HOTS) for History subjects in primary schools. This survey study with a quantitative approach involved a total of 100 teachers in Bangsar district, Kuala Lumpur. The researcher used a questionnaire instrument and a 5-point likert scale in this study. The data information obtained was analyzed using Statistical for Social Science version 26.0. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean score and standard system). The findings of the study reported that the level of readiness of primary school teachers to apply KBAT in the subject of History exceeded the medium-high level. The mean score for each aspect evaluated is knowledge (mean = 4.12), skills (mean = 3.94) and attitude (mean = 3.97). This means that teachers have a high potential in applying KBAT in History subjects if their talent is successfully polished from the early stages of their studies, which is at the college of teachers. The results of this study can be used as a guide by all primary school teachers in applying KBAT in the teaching of History. In addition, it also emphasizes the importance of continuous professional development and institutional support in strengthening teachers' skills in integrating KBAT in the teaching of History.

References

Abdul Halim Masnan, N. E. (2019). Pengetahuan Pengajaran dalam Kalangan Guru Prasekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-kanak, 33-41.
Abdul Talib, N. S., Awang, M. M., Abdul Ghani, K., & Yusuff, N. A. (2019). Penggunaan Multimedia Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sejarah. International Online Journal of Language, Communication, and Humanities, 2(2), 86-98.
Agus, A. N. A. (2021). Tahap Pengetahuan Dan Kesediaan guru Bahasa Melayu Dalam Melaksanakan pendekatan TERBEZA dalam pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Rumah Semasa tempoh Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu.
Anderson, L.W., D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C(2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assesing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & BaconBacon-Shone, J. (2015). A guide to the understanding and interpretation of data. Hong Kong University Press.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2003). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, & utilization (5th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
Boyle, G. J., & Fisher, S. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Fathizaki Rifin, Anuar Ahmad, Norasmah Othman .2021. Kompetensi guru dalam penerapan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam pengajaran pendidikan sejarah. ,Volume 6, Issue 1, (page 194 - 205)
Gurganious, N. J. (2017). The relationship between teacher autonomy and middle
school students' achievement in science. [Doctoral dissertation], Walden University.
Harun,M.& A.Ghani, K. (2016). Kebolehpercayaan dan Kesahan dalam Penyelidikan Kualitatif: Isu dan Aplikasi. Penerbit UTM Press.
Jamaludin Ahmad (2008). Kaedah penyelidikan dan analisis data. McGraw-Hill Education.
Kamaruddin, S. N., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Kesediaan Guru sejarah sekolah menengah mengaplikasikan Kbat Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sejarah.
Kanafadzi, V., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2021).Tahap Kesediaan Dan Sikap guru Terhadap Perubahan Yang Berlaku .
Kaviza, M., Rahim, F. A., & Bukhari, N. (2018). Tahap kesediaan guru-guru Sejarah Dalam melaksanakan Kaedah Pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan sumber sejarah: Satu Tinjauan di negeri perlis. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Kisni Kisson (2021). Penggunaan KBAT dalam pendidikan: Satu kajian empirikal. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 10(2), 112-125.
Mengistie, S. M. (2020). Primary school teachers’ knowledge, attitude and practice of
differentiated instruction: The case of in-service teacher- trainees of Debre
Markos College of teacher education, West Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region,
Ethiopia. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 98–114.
Mohd Majid Konting (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Muhammad Aziz Shah (2010). Kaedah penyelidikan sains sosial. Oxford Fajar.
Nurzarina Amran & Roslinda Rosli. (2017). Kefahaman guru tentang kemahiran abad ke21. Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial dan Komunikasi. Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan (PASAK 2) JILID 1, pp. 110-114. Pusat Pengajian Teras, Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor.
Radzi, N. M., & Muzammil, N. F. binti. (2018). Tahap kompetensi guru dalam pelaksanaan kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di Sekolah Kebangsaan Daerah Sepang, Selangor. JuKu.
Rajendran, N. S. (2010). Teaching thinking skills at institutions of higher learning:Lesson learned. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 18, 1-14.
Schleicher, A. (2019). Thoughts on the future of teaching. Brill.