Kreativiti Guru Dalam Pengajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah: Mengenal Pasti Elemen Amalan Pedagogi Kreatif Guru Sains Menggunakan Nominal Group Technique (NGT)

  • Aisyah Khalil Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Norazilawati Abdullah

Abstract

This article is discussing about the application of Nominal Group Technique (NGT) in identifying the elements of creativity through inquiry in teaching science. The objective is to determine to what extent this technique can adopted in assessing the elements of creative science inquiry in teaching.   This technique was conducted in first phase of researcher’s research about the design development of a Creative through Inquiry (CSi) pedagogy model to identify the usability of that model among primary school science teachers. The findings show this technique can help the researcher to obtain the data in simple and fastest way because the usability of the technique applied can acquire directly from the items’ percentage score.

References

Abdullah, N. et al. (2020). Primary school science teachers’ creativity and practice in Malaysia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 20(7), 346-364.
Aizzat Mohd. Nasurdin, Intan Osman & Zainal Ariffin Ahmad (2006). Pengantar Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Akun, J.C., Anak, Mohamad, F.S. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and the teaching of science: Determiners for professional development. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(1), 1-12.
Balakrishnan, B. (2002). Penilaian pelaksanaan kemahiran berfikir secara kreatif dan kritis dalam matapelajaran sejarah KBSM Tingkatan 4 satu kajian kes di Daerah Taampin dan Rembau, Negeri Sembilan. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Bakhshi, H., Downing, J.M., Osborne, M.A., Schneider, P. (2017). The Future of Skills Employment in 2030. ISBN: 978-0-992-42595-1. London: Pearson and Nesta. Available at: https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_future_of_skills_employment_in_2030_0.pdf, accessed March, 11th, 2020
Cai, J. & Lester, F. (2010). Why if Teaching with Problem Solving Important to Student Learning. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Chan, D. W. (2007). Creative teaching in Hong Kong schools: Constraints and challenges. Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 1-12.
Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003
Cremin, T., & Oliver, L. (2017). Teachers as writers: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 32(3), 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1187664.
Dang, V.H. (2015). The Use of Nominal Group Technique: Case Study in Vietnam. World Journal of Education, 5(4), 14-25.
Dhanapal, S., Wan, E.Z.S., (2014). A Study on the Effectiveness of Hand-on experiments in Learning Science among Year 4 Students. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 3(1), 20-31.
Dobbie, A., Rhodes, M., Tysinger, JW. & Freeman, J. (2004). Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique as a Curriculum Evaluation Tool, Family Medicine, 36(3). 402-406.
Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching. Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states.
Hamza, M. K., & Farrow, V. (2000). Yes, you can foster creativity and problem solving in your classroom. Kappa Delta Pi- Record, 37 (1), 33-35.
Harvey, N. & Holmes, C.A. (2012). Nominal Group Technique: An effective method for obtaining group consensus. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18, 188-195.
Hussin, Z., Siraj, S., & Nor, N. M. M. (2018). Aplikasi Teknik Ngt (Nominal Group Technique-Teknik Kumpulan Nominal) Dalam Penilaian Elemen Model Pembangunan Profesionalisme Perguruan Pendidikan Islam. O-JIE: Online Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1), 67-76.
Ikhsan O., & Norila, M. S. (2005). Kurikulum & Pengajaran Sekolah Rendah, Aspek-aspek yang berkaitan. Tanjong Malim: Quantum Books.
Ismail, N., Desa, S., Balakrishnan, B. (2018). Science Creative Teaching Design for Science Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Byssiness & Social Sciences, 8(4).
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lawson, R. A. (2002). The Findings of The ImpaCT2 Evaluation: Implications for Sociology Teachers. Konferens Tahunan Pertubuhan Pengajaran Sains Sosial, University Helsinki.
Lou, S. & Chen, N. (2012). Using blended creative teaching: Improving a teacher education course on designing materials for young children. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 776-792.
Mahmud, S.N.D., Mohamad Nasir, N., Samsudin, M.A., & Halim, L. (2018). Science teacher education in Malaysia: challenges and way forward. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4.
Mann, R. L. (2005). Gifted Students with Spatial Strength and Sequential Weakness: An Overlooked, and Under-identified Population, Paper Review, 27,91-96
McMillan, S.S., King, M., & Tully, M.P. (2016). How to use the Nominal Group and Delphi Technique. Int J Clin Pharm (38), 655-662
DOI 10-1007/s11096-016-0257-x
Mohamad, N., & Mohamad Yasin, R. (2010). Amalan Pengajaran Guru dalam reka bentuk dan teknologi: tinjauan dari perspektif pelajar tingkatan satu pelbagai elektf. Dalam seminar Antarabangsa Pendidikan Kepelbagaian Pelajar. Hotel Equatorial, Bangi.
Mohd Ridhuan, M. J. (2016). Model Kurikulum Latihan SKiVes bagi program pengajian kejuruteraan pembelajaran berasakan kerja (WBL). Politeknik Malaysia. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).
Morais, M. F., & Azevedo, I. (2011). What is a creative teacher and what is a creative pupil? Perceptions of teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 330-339.
Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy. Teacher and Teacher Education, 17(2), 243–261.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management, 42(1), 15-29.
Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Creative teaching and its assessment.
Rashimah, A. K. (2012). Tahap kreativiti dan penyelesaian masalah fizik pelajar tingkatan empat di daerah Johor Bharu. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rinkevich, J. L. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 219-223.
Roslinda, G. (2007). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis dan Kreatif (KBKK) dalam mata pelajaran Fizik di kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rashidah, M., Saedah, S., and Zaharah, H. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam pembangunan modul pengajaran pantun Melayu berasaskan maksud al-Quran mengenai keindahan flora, fauna dan langit tingkatan 2. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. 8(2), 57-67.
Sale, D. (2005, May). De-mystifying Creative Teaching Competence. In International Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice.
Satzinger, J. B., Jackson, R. B., & Burd, S. D. (2010). System Analysis and Design with the Unified Process. United State: Course Technology, Cengage Learning.
Shkabarina M., Verbytska K., Vitiuk V., Shemchuk V. & Saleychuk E. (2020). Development of Pedagogical Creativity of Future Teachers of Primary School by Means of Innovative Education Technologies. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensiola, 12(4), 137-155.
Siti Hajar, A. (2008). Tahap kreativiti di kalangan pelajar program sains di Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda.
Soon, Singh A/L Bikar Singh. (2011). Perhubungan antara kreativiti figura dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar: satu tinjauan dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di beberapa buah sekolah di Kuala Lumpur. e-BANGI: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 6 (1), 90-101.
Skulmoski, G.J., Hartman, F.T. & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved November 13, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111405/
Varga-Atkins, T., with contributions from Bunyan, N; McIsaac, J; Fewtrell J. (2011) The Nominal Group Technique: a practical guide for facilitators. Written for the ELESIG Small Grants Scheme. Liverpool: University of Liverpool. October. Version 1.0
Williams, P.L., White, N., Klem, R., Wilson, S.E., & Bartholomew, P. (2006). Clinical education and training: Using the nominal group technique in research with radiographers to identify factors affecting quality and capacity, Radiography, 12 (3), 215-224. doi10.1016/j.radi.2005.06.001
Yahya Buntat & Noor Sharliana Mat Nasir (2011). Faktor-faktror yang mendorong kreativiti dalam di kalangan pelajar Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling. 2(1), 175-208.
Published
2023-12-31
How to Cite
KHALIL, Aisyah; ABDULLAH, Norazilawati. Kreativiti Guru Dalam Pengajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah: Mengenal Pasti Elemen Amalan Pedagogi Kreatif Guru Sains Menggunakan Nominal Group Technique (NGT). Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 77-89, dec. 2023. ISSN 2682-826X. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/24764>. Date accessed: 17 apr. 2024.
Section
Articles