• Nur Azila Yahya Mathematical Sciences Studies, College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, Tapah, MALAYSIA
  • Najihan Awang @ Ali Mathematical Sciences Studies, College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, Tapah, MALAYSIA
  • Noryani Muhammad Fakulti Kejuteraan Mekanikal, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, MALAYSIA


This paper presents students ‘satisfaction on blended learning specifically within a Mathematics course at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Perak Branch, Tapah Campus. The study addresses various concerns related to blended learning approach for example students' satisfaction with this teaching mode, such as students' low interest in learning, lack of learning action, and failure to meet students' needs in terms of teaching methods and learning platform technology. A total of 131 diploma students were selected for this research, with data collected between March and August of the 2023 academic semester to evaluate their levels of satisfaction. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. The outcomes of the analysis indicate that the extent to which students agree with the teaching dimension positively correlates with their satisfaction on blended learning. However, learning dimension which is attitude and behavior of student in learning very affected their average satisfaction which indicates very low compared to other factors. To enhance the growth of blended learning and improve teaching effectiveness, it is imperative to delve into further exploration and engage in proactive problem-solving efforts.


Ahmad Zaini, A., Marini, F., & Canda, R. (2013). Adopting blended learning: An analysis and review of students’ acceptance in UiTM Pahang.
Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., Eltahir, M., & Aqel, K. (2021). Does Blended Learning Improve the Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students in the Mathematics Course? A Case Study in Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), 1–14.
Alwadood, Z., Abd Halim, S., & Sulaiman, H. (2018). High failure rate in mathematics subject: influencing factors and study styles. Social and Management Research Journal (SMRJ), 15(2), 108–118.
Batista-Toledo, S., & Gavilan, D. (2023). Student Experience, Satisfaction and Commitment in Blended Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Mathematics, 11(3).
Bozkurt, A. (2022). A Retro Perspective on Blended/Hybrid Learning: Systematic Review, Mapping and Visualization of the Scholarly Landscape. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1).
Bringula, R., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D. D., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1–23.
Casinillo, L. (2019). Factors affecting the failure rate in mathematics: the case of Visayas State University (VSU). Review of Socio-Economic Research and Development Studies, 3(1), 1–18.
Castro-Rodríguez, M. M., Marín-Suelves, D., López-Gómez, S., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. (2021). Mapping of scientific production on blended learning in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(9), 494.
Cheng, X., Mo, W., & Duan, Y. (2023). Factors contributing to learning satisfaction with blended learning teaching mode among higher education students in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(June), 1–12.
Hassim, N. H., & Zainal Abidin, S. (2020). Factors contributing to high failure rate of mat 183 based on students’ point of view: A case study in UiTM Pahang branch Raub campus. Gading Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 209–213.
Imran, R., Fatima, A., Salem, I. E., & Allil, K. (2023). Teaching and learning delivery modes in higher education: Looking back to move forward post-COVID-19 era. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100805.
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1).
Linder, K. E. (2017). Fundamentals of hybrid teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(149), 11–18.
Lyakhova, S., & Joubert, M. (2022). Post-16 Further Mathematics blended learning: Learner self-regulation, mathematical resilience and technology. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 41(1), 51–68.
Nazeranah, N., Din, O., Zainal, N., & Balakrishna, S. (2023). FACTORS INFLUENCING JOB SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION. 5(2), 112–125.
Platonova, R. I., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Dautova, S. B., Martynenko, E. V, Kryukova, N. I., & Demir, S. (2022). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Diversifying Models and Practical Recommendations for Researchers. Frontiers in Education, 7, 957199.
Ramalingam, S., Hashim, H. U., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Trends of Blended Language Learning in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions: Implementation, Challenges & Possibilities. Blended Language Learning: Evidence-Based Trends and Applications.
Soto, R. C., & Soto, M. (2023). Meeting the Challenge: Using VoiceThread to Design Student-Centered Mathematics Courses. PRIMUS, 33(3), 219–232.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.
Taghizadeh, M., & Hajhosseini, F. (2021). Investigating a blended learning environment: Contribution of attitude, interaction, and quality of teaching to satisfaction of graduate students of TEFL. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30, 459–469.
Yimer, S. T. (2022). Effective Instruction for Calculus Learning Outcomes through Blending co-operative Learning and Geogebra. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 14(3), 170–189.
How to Cite
YAHYA, Nur Azila; AWANG @ ALI, Najihan; MUHAMMAD, Noryani. ASSESSING STUDENT SATISFACTION WITH BLENDED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS COURSES. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 1-12, sep. 2023. ISSN 2682-8464. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 26 feb. 2024.