LEXICAL INFERENCING STRATEGIES: THE CASE OF HIGH-PROFICIENCY VERSUS LOW-PROFICIENCY VIETNAMESE EFL STUDENTS

  • Nguyen Thi Anh Thu Department of International Cooperation, Vinh Long University of Technology Education, Vinh Long, VIETNAM

Abstract

This study examines the lexical inferencing strategies Vietnamese EFL students at high-proficiency (HP) and low-proficiency (LP) levels use when they attempt to guess the meaning of unknown words while reading an English text. The study also intends to find out if there is a difference between HP learners and LP learners in terms of the number of successful guesses that are made. A reading proficiency test was given to participants to classify them into two groups of HP and LP. Data consist of think-aloud protocols of 20 second-year English-majored students of a university in Vinh Long City, Vietnam, who attempted to infer the meaning of unknown words in a written text. Results reveal that students used a variety of strategies for guessing unknown words, but not all students used all strategies for their lexical inferencing. The findings also indicate that both HP and LP learners made a small number of successful guesses in attempting to infer the meanings of the unknown words, and that HP learners made more correct lexical inferencing than their LP counterparts, but the difference is not considerable. This study can inspire teachers, textbook writers, and students to attend more to different strategies and lexical inference.

References

Bensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7, 15-32.
De Bot, K., Paribakht, T.S. & Wesche, M.B. (1997). Toward a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition: evidence form ESL reading. Studies in Second language Acquisition, 19:309-329.
Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical inferencing procedures or talking about words. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
Hu, M., & Nassaji, H. (2014). Lexical inferencing strategies: The case of successful versus less successful inferencers. System, 45, 27-38.
Lee, J., & Wolf, D. (1997). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of word-meaning inferencing strategies of L1 and L2 readers. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 24-46.
Macaro, E. & Mutton, T. (2009). Developing reading achievement in primary learners of
French: Inferencing Strategies versus Exposure to “Graded Readers”. Language
Learning Journal, 37:165-182. doi: 10.1080/09571730902928045
Morrison, L. (1996). Talking about words: A study of French as a second language learners’ lexical inferencing procedure. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 41-75.
Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 645-670.
Nassaji, H. (2004). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61 (1), 107-134.
Nassaji, H., & Hu, M. (2012). The relationship between task-induced involvement load and learning words from context. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 50, 69-86.
Oxford, R.L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language Teaching An anthology of current practice (pp. 124-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paribakht, T.S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “Incidental” L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 195-229.
Paribakht, T.S. (2004). The role of grammar in second language lexical processing. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 35:149-160. doi: 10.1177/003368820403500204
Pavlik, C. & Segal, M.K (1997). Interactions 2 – Instructor’s Manual/ Test Bank (the 3rd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Pressley, M. & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
Qian, D. (2004). Second language lexical inferencing: Preferences, perceptions and practices.
In P Bogaards & B Laufer (eds). Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riazi, A., & Babaei, N. (2008). Iranian EFL female students, lexical inferencing and its relationship to their L2 proficiency and reading skill. The Reading Matrix, 8(1).
Richards, J. C., Platt, H. & Platt, J. (Eds.). (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Longman Group UK Limited.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. N. Schmitt, M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 199-227
Shen, M.Y. & Wu. W.S. (2009). Technical University EFL Learners’ Reading Proficiency and Their Lexical Inference Performance. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language
Teaching, 6:189-200. Available at http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v6n22009/shen.pdf.
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (2010). Lexical Inferencing in a First and Second Language: Cross-linguistic Dimensions. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Published
2021-11-23
How to Cite
THU, Nguyen Thi Anh. LEXICAL INFERENCING STRATEGIES: THE CASE OF HIGH-PROFICIENCY VERSUS LOW-PROFICIENCY VIETNAMESE EFL STUDENTS. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 1-15, nov. 2021. ISSN 2682-8464. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap/article/view/16229>. Date accessed: 15 aug. 2022.
Section
Articles