Comparative Analysis of Existing Guidelines on the Pedestrian Facilities for Person with Disabilities (PwD)

Suriani Ngah Abdul Wahab; Dzatin Aiman Zaharuddin; Shahela Mamter

Suriani Ngah Abdul Wahab
Dzatin Aiman Zaharuddin
Shahela Mamter

Abstract

Malaysia, being a developing nation, has actively participated in endeavours to ensure equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities through its recent legislation, the Persons with Disabilities Act 2008. However, there remains a significant challenge regarding the accessibility of pedestrian facilities for Persons with Disabilities (PwDs). It is crucial to address this issue promptly and find ways to enhance pedestrian infrastructure in order to provide comfort and satisfaction to all users, regardless of their abilities. Consequently, a framework outlining criterion for pedestrian facilities specifically designed for PwDs has been established. This research aim is to identify the existing guidelines on the pedestrian facilities. It specifically studies on Klang Valley guideline for designing a pedestrian facility especially for those PwD. This research is based on data obtained from survey questionnaire and document analysis of current guideline of Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore and United Kingdom. The data was analysed to identify the existing guidelines on the pedestrian facilities. The research suggested that successful pedestrian facilities as pedestrian facilities that is comfort to be used by all users regard the ability. The results of the study also suggested that a holistic improvised to ensure that the PwD could reach any area independently. It is hope that the study can contribute to the improvement pedestrian facilities for PwD in Klang Valley.

References

Bharucha, J. (2017). An investigation into the walkability problem in Indian cities. Safer Communities, 16(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-02-2017-0010
Department of Public Work. (2014). MS1184:2014 Code of Practice on Access for Disabled Persons to Public Buildings.
Government of Malaysia. (2014). Law of Malaysia: Person with Disabilities Act 2008.
Gray, J. A., Zimmerman, J. L., & Rimmer, J. H. (2012). Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: Disability and universal design relevant? In Disability and Health Journal (Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 87–101). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.12.002
Kumar. R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.
Land Transport Authority Singapore, & Urban Development Authority Singapore. (2018). Walking and Cycling Design Guide.
Law Insider Inc. (2022). Pedestrian facilities definition. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/pedestrian-facilities
Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No 3/PRT/M: Tentang Pedoman Perencanaan, Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana dan Sarjana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Perkotaan.
Ministry of Local Government Development. (2011). GP015-A GPP Rekabentuk Sejagat (Universal Design). In Town and Country Department Peninsula Malaysia.
Presiden Rebublik Indonesia. (2002). Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 28 of 2002: Concerning buildings.
Rosenberg, D. E., Huang, D. L., Simonovich, S. D., & Belza, B. (2013). Outdoor built environment barriers and facilitators to activity among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities. Gerontologist, 53(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns119
Shinar, D. (2007). Pedestrians. In Traffic Safety and Human Behavior (pp. 613–656). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080555874-015
Social and Welfare Department. (2021). Statistik Orang Kurang Upaya Yang Berdaftar.
Social and Welfare Department. (2022). Dasar Orang Kurang Upaya. https://www.jkm.gov.my/jkm/index.php?r=portal/left&id=cCtGNGNKVE9obFhBRUl5RERPRjVoUT09
Tanan, N., & Darmoyono, L. (2017). Achieving walkable city in Indonesia: Policy and responsive design through public participation. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011598
The Institute for Transportation Development Policy (ITDP). (2017). Jakarta NMT Vision and Design Guideline.
Torres-Ruiz, M., Moreno-Ibarra, M., Alhalabi, W., Quintero, R., & Guzmán, G. (2018). Towards a microscopic model for analyzing the pedestrian mobility in an urban infrastructure. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0023
United Nation. (2022). Article 1- Purpose.
United Nations. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2018). Building Disability-Inclusive Societies in Asia and the Pacific : Assessing Progress of the Incheon Strategy. 76.
Washburn, S. S., Leistner, D. L., & Ko, B. (2006). An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Pedestrian Countdown Signals. In Transport Science and Technology (pp. 311–326). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080467542-024
World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Disabilities. https://www.who.int/health-topics/disability#tab=tab_1
Yen, I. H., Flood, J. F., Thompson, H., Anderson, L. A., & Wong, G. (2014). How design of places promotes or inhibits mobility of older adults: Realist synthesis of 20 years of research. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1340–1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314527610
Zacharias, J. (2009). The Pedestrian Itinerary–Purposes, Environmental Factors and Path Decisions. In Pedestrian Behavior (pp. 283–306). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781848557512-013