DOES DEBT STRUCTURE AFFECT FIRM’S PERFORMANCE? PANEL EVIDENCE FROM SHARIAH APPROVED FIRM IN MALAYSIA

  • Nurshamimitul Ezza Ramli Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
  • Nurul Nazlia Jamil Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)

Abstract

High reliance on debt proved contributes to the downfalls of large U.S. corporations such as Enron (2001), Lehman Brothers (2008) as well as during the 2009 Greek depression. Given the current uncertainty in the global economic condition, it is important to examine the return from debt in order to ascertain the optimal use of debt. Thus, this paper aims to assess the impact of the debt level on the performance of Shariah-approved firms listed on Bursa Malaysia. Various studies have been conducted to explain the influence of debt on the firm’s performance, given different sets of periods, countries, methodologies as well as the selection of the variables. However, less attention is given to the Shariah approved firms. Uniquely, this study focuses on the consistent Shariah approved firms only, for the period of 2000 to 2014 according to Malaysia’s Securities Commission. Our main explanatory variable is debt ratio and several firm characteristics, industry characteristics, as well as economic variables, are chosen as a controlled variable. ROA is chosen as a firms performance proxy. This study employs a panel linear regression model which includes the pooled OLS, random effect model (REM) and fixed effect model (FEM). Our analysis proved that debt is not a robust determinant to determine the performance of Shariah approved firms in Malaysia. However, several controlled variables such as growth, size and Z-score are found robust to determine Shariah approved firms’ performance. Our analysis also found that there is a variation in terms of debt structure of the Shariah approved firms in Malaysia and our further analysis revealed that variation in debt structure contributes differently to the performance of the firms. The output from this study provides new insight and understanding in determining the relationship between performance and debt of Shariah approved firm in Malaysia specifically. This study largely contributes in terms of the sampling selection in which a firm must be consistently Shariah approved during the period of analysis.

References

Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438–445.
Altman, E. I. (1984). A further empirical investigation of the bankruptcy cost question. The Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1067–1089.
Charalambakis, E. C., & Psychoyios, D. (2012). What do we know about capital structure? Revisiting the impact of debt ratios on some firm-specific factors. Applied Financial Economics, 22(20), 1727–1742.
Davis, E. P. (1995). Debt, financial fragility and systemic risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.
Davydov, D. (2016). Debt structure and corporate performance in emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 299–311.
González, V. M. (2013). Leverage and corporate performance: International evidence. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25, 169–184.
Haron, R. (2014). Capital structure inconclusiveness: Evidence from Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 10(1), 23–38.
Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312.
Khan, A. G. (2012). The relationship of capital structure decisions with firm performance: A study of the engineering sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(1), 245–262.
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(1), 147–175.
Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. The Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015–1040.
Salim, M., & Yadav, R. (2012). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 156–166.
San, O. T., & Teh, B. H. (2011). Capital structure and corporate performance of Malaysian construction sector. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(2), 28–36.
Tsuruta, D. (2017). Variance of firm performance and leverage of small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(3), 329–502.
Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015). The effect of leverage on performance: Domestically-oriented versus internationally-oriented firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 34(1), 265–280.
Yazdanfar, D., & Öhman, P. (2015). Debt financing and firm performance: An empirical study based on Swedish data. The Journal of Risk Finance, 16(1), 102–118.
Zeitun, R., & Tian, G. (2007). Capital structure and corporate performance: Evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal Capital, 1(4).
Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
RAMLI, Nurshamimitul Ezza; JAMIL, Nurul Nazlia. DOES DEBT STRUCTURE AFFECT FIRM’S PERFORMANCE? PANEL EVIDENCE FROM SHARIAH APPROVED FIRM IN MALAYSIA. International Journal of Business and Economy, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 10-19, june 2019. ISSN 2682-8359. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec/article/view/6714>. Date accessed: 07 feb. 2023.
Section
Articles