A Phenomenological Analysis of Divergent Experience of Digital Visualization in Graphic Design

  • Mohd Hafnidzam Adzmi
  • Zahari Ishak
  • Che Aleha Ladin

Abstract

Divergent thinking is a process that is associated with creativity. As quantitative studies dominate creativity research, this article presents an idiographic interpretation of the Divergent Experience in Digital Visualization. As experience is the object of study, this study employs the phenomenological method. Data are collected through protocol analysis from seven participants. The data is then analyzed through the phenomenological reduction. The findings presented the varying degrees of divergent experiences followed by discussions or a critical dialogue with theories of creativity, knowledge representations and analogical thinking.

References

Alipur, L., Faizi, M., & Moradi, A. M. (2017). The impact of designers' goals on design-by-analogy. Design Studies, 51, 1-24.
Ayman-Nolley, S. (1999). A Piagetian perspective on the dialectic process of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 267-275.
Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165-178.
Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1-15.
Casakin, H. (2010). Visual analogy, visual displays, and the nature of design problems: the effect of practice. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, 170-188.
Choi, H. H., & Kim, M. J. (2017). The effects of analogical and metaphorical reasoning on design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 29-41.
Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227.
Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47-60.
Dasgupta, S. (2019). A cognitive historical approach to creativity. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215-251.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1-38.
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, Pa: Duquesne University Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding the design process. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (2016). Linkographic evidence for concurrent divergent and convergent thinking in creative design. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 115-122.
Goldschmidt, G., & Weil, M. (1998). Contents and structure in design reasoning. Design Issues, 14(3), 85-100.
Guilfrod, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267-293.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52(1), 35-44.
Jia, L., Becattini, N., Cascini, G., & Tan, R. (2019). Testing ideation performance on a large set of designers: effects of analogical distance. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation.
Kirkhart, M. (2001). The nature of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge for implicit and explicit learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 128(4), 447-461.
Kokotovich, V. (2000). Mental synthesis and creativity in design: an experimental examination. Design Studies, 21(5), 437-449.
Lang, G. T., Eberts, R. E., Gabel, M. G., & Barash, M. M. (1991). Extracting and using procedural knowledge in a CAD task. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(3), 257-268.
Lewicki, P., Czyzewska, M., & Hoffman, H. (1987). Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(4), 523-530.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2006). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Long, H. (2014). An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003-2012). Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 427-438.
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 141-159.
McNamara, T. P. (1994). Knowledge representation. In R. J. Sternbergh, Handbook of perception and cognition(2nd ed.). Thinking and problem solving (pp. 81-117). Academic Press.
Moustakas, C. (2010). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 93-96.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243-267.
Sharps, M. J., & Wertheimer, M. (2000). Gestalt perspectives on cognitive science and on experimental psychology. Review of General Psychology, 4(4), 315-336.
Simon, H. A. (2001). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 307-346.
ten Berge, T., & van Hezewijk, R. (1999). Procedural and declarative knowledge: An evolutionary perspective. Theory Psychology, 9(5), 605-624.
Thurstone, L. L. (1950). Some primary abilities in visual thinking. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 94(6), 517-521.
Trench, M., & Minervino, R. A. (2015). The role of surface similarity in analogical retrieval: Bridging the gap between the naturalistic and the experimental traditions. Cognitive Science, 39, 1292-1319.
Published
2021-03-01
How to Cite
ADZMI, Mohd Hafnidzam; ISHAK, Zahari; LADIN, Che Aleha. A Phenomenological Analysis of Divergent Experience of Digital Visualization in Graphic Design. International Journal of Advanced Research in Technology and Innovation, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-10, mar. 2021. ISSN 2682-8324. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijarti/article/view/12466>. Date accessed: 21 may 2022.
Section
Articles