Tazkiyat Al-Nafs and Scientific Worldview: Contrast and Critique

  • Md Maruf Hasan
  • Muhammad Mumtaz Ali

Abstract

This research argues that to understand the position of the scientific worldview and Islam on Tazkiyat Al-Nafs we need first to study from a new perspective the relation between science and Islam. For this purpose, the qualitative method of content analysis is adopted. The article analyses the views of four thinkers namely Pervez Hoodbhoy, Al-Biruni, Muhammad Iqbal and Fazlur Rahman. Their position on the relationship between science and religion helps to analyze the views of Islamic and scientific worldview on Tazkiyat Al-Nasf and soul. Pervez Hoodbhoy finds the nature of the relationship between science and religion historically problematic. Al-Biruni, Muhammad Iqbal and Fazlur Rahman, three of them, provide the key elements in understanding how Islam views science and promotes it fully. Their views make up the position of Islam on Tazkiyat Al-Nafs. The article argues that the real contradiction is not between Islam and science, but between Tazkiyat Al-Nafs and the scientific worldview. An argument is provided to clarify the position of Islam on Tazkiyat Al-Nafs over the scientific worldview. The article concludes that Tazkiyat Al-Nafs can work perfectly with what the evolutionary scientist Stephen J. Gould called the “nonoverlapping majesteria”, where science and religion occupy different domains; so, no conflict can ever occur. The article hopes that Tazkiyat Al-Nafs can regain its important position in the contemporary world, as it can provide the best alternative to the scientific worldview for the holistic development of younger generation of Muslims.

References

Azzam, M. A. (1996). Mabda Al-Tatawur Al-Hayawi Lada Falasifa Al-Islam. Beirut: Mua’sassa Al-Jami’iya Lil Dirisat.
Biruni, Al-. (1887). Ma Lil-Hind Min Maqulat Maqbula Fi Al-‘Aql Aw Marthula. London: Trubner & Co.
Bukhari, Al-. A. D. (2013). Muljim Al-Mujassima. Beirut: Dar Al-Dhakhair.
Cottee, S. (2015). The Apostates: When Muslims Leave Islam. London: C Hurst & Co.
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. London: Penguin.
Dennett, D. C. (2007). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Penguin.
Draper, J. W. (2009). History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 188.
Draz, M. A. (2000). Introduction to the Quran. London: I.B. Taurus, p. 99.
Elshakry, M. (2013). Reading Darwin in Arabic, 1860-1950. University of Chicago Press, p. 175.
Fakhry, M. (2008). Averroes. Oxford: One World.
Gilmore, R. (2015). Pragmatism and Islam in Peirce and Iqbal: The Metaphysics of Emergent Mind. In H. C. Hillier & B.B. Koshul (Eds.), Muhammad Iqbal: Essays on Reconstruction of Modern Muslim Thought (pp. 88-111). Edinburgh University Press.
Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), pp. 16-22.
Guessoum, N. (2010). Islam's Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London: I.B. Tauris, pp.271-324.
Gura, P. F. (2008). American Transcendentalism: A History. New York: Hill & Wang.
Hamidullah, M. (2004). The Emergence of Islam. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute,pp. 143-5.
Hoodbhoy, P. (1991). Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality. London: Zed Books.
Ibn Rushd. (1994). Bidayat Al-Mujtahid. Cairo: Maktaba Ibn Taymiya.
Iqbal, M. (2002). Secrets of the Self. Uttar Pradesh, India: Pilgrims Publishing.
Iqbal, M. (2012a). Taking Issue & Allah’s Answer. London: Penguin.
Iqbal, M. (2020). The Devil’s Advisory Council. Selangor, Malaysia: The Other Press.
Iqbal. M. (2012b). The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan.
Isfahani, Al-. A. N. (2001). Sifat Al-Nifaq Wa Na’t Al-Munafiqin. Beirut: Dar Al-Bashair Al-Islamiya.
Izutsu, T. (2002). Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur'an. Mc-Gill Queen’s University.
Jackson, R. (2007). Nietzsche and Islam. New York: Routledge, pp. 57-61.
Jalajel, D. S. (2009). Islam and Biological Evolution: Exploring Classical Sources and Methodologies. University of the Western Cape.
Kamaruzzaman, K. O. (2003). Al-Biruni: Father of Comparative Religion. Intellectual Discourse 11(2), p. 113-138.
Lee, R. D. (1997). Overcoming Tradition and Modernity: The Search for Islamic Authenticity. Colorado: Westview Press, pp. 57-82.
Majeed, J. (2009). Muhammad Iqbal: Islam, Aesthetics and Postcolonialism. New Delhi: Routledge.
Malagaris, G. (2020). Biruni. India: Oxford University Publication.
Martin, C. (2014). Subverting Aristotle: Religion, History, and Philosophy in Early Modern Science. John Hopkins University Press.
McGrath, A. E. (2011). Darwinism and the Divine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nahas, Al-. A. J. (1988). Ma’ani Al-Quran Al-Karim. Mecca: Umm Al-Qura University, p. 16.
Pew Research Centre, The share of Americans who leave Islam is offset by those who become Muslim, 2018, Accessed September 03, 2021 See: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/26/the-share-of-americans-who-leave-islam-is-offset-by-those-who-become-muslim/
Qahtani, Al-. S. (1999). Nur Al-Iman Wa Dhulumat Al-Nifaq. Riyadh: Maktab Malik Fahad Al-Watani.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. University of Chicago.
Rahman, F. (1988). Islamic methodology in history. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute.
Rahman, F. (1999). Major Themes of the Quran.Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 1999.
Rahman, F. (2003). Revival and Reform in Islam. Oxford: One World, pp. 132-165.
Salim-Atchekzai, M. (1974, June). A pioneer of scientific observation. UNESCO: The Courier, p. 17.
Sarton, G. (1927). Introduction to the History of Science. Carnegie Institution of Washington, v.1 p. 707.
Shinqiti, Al-. M. A. M. (2005). Tafsir Al-Quran Bil Quran Min Adhwa Al-Bayan. Egypt: Dar Al-Hadi Al-Nabawi, p. 8.
Taliaferro, C. & Meister, C. (2016). Contemporary Philosophical Theology. London: Routledge, p. 4.
Van Mazjik, C. (2019). Heidegger and Husserl on the Technological-Scientific Worldview. Human Studies 42, pp. 519-541.
Waller, J. (2019). Cosmological Fine-Tuning Arguments. London: Routledge, pp. 234-247.
Wilson, D. (2003). Darwin’s Cathedral. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Yafi, Al-. A. (2002). Hiwar Al-Biruni Wa Ibn Sina. Damascus: Dar Al-Fikr.
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
HASAN, Md Maruf; ALI, Muhammad Mumtaz. Tazkiyat Al-Nafs and Scientific Worldview: Contrast and Critique. International Journal of Advanced Research in Islamic and Humanities, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 27-42, dec. 2021. ISSN 2682-8332. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijarih/article/view/16628>. Date accessed: 28 may 2022.
Section
Articles