The Methodological and Theoretical Application of Space Syntax in Coworking: A Literature Review
Abstract
Coworking space is a recently emerged phenomenon in the workplace, and registered coworking organizations have been increasing. Therefore, more and more researchers have explored the field of coworking space from various disciplinary perspectives. However, the study of coworking space that reflects the analysis of space syntax methods and theories has been overlooked. A literature review that considers the methodological and theoretical application of space syntax in coworking spatial configuration analysis is needed.
References
Backhouse, A., & Drew, P. (1992). The design implications of social interaction in a. workplace setting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19, 573-584.
Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user. motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040
Bouncken, R., & Aslam, M. (2021). Bringing the design perspective to coworking spaces: Constitutive entanglement of actors and artefacts. European Management Journal, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.10.008
Bouncken, B., Aslam, M., & Qiu, Y. (2020b). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.bushor.2020.09.010
Bouncken, B., Lapidus, A., & Qui, Y. (2022). Organizational sustainability identity: ‘New Work’ of home offices and coworking spaces as facilitators. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100011
Bouncken, R.& Ratzmann, M.& Barwinski, R.& Kraus, S. (2020a). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03. 033
Bouncken, R., & Reuschl, A. (2018). Coworking spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and entrepreneurship. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
Bueno, S., Rodriguez-Baltanas, G., & Gallegos, M. (2018). Coworking spaces: a new way of achieving productivity. Journal of facilities management. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JFM-01-2018-0006
Butcher, T. (2013, December). Coworking: locating community at work. In Proceedings of the 27th annual australia new zealand academy of management (ANZAM) conference (pp. 1-13).
Gandini, A. (2015). The rush of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: theory& politics in organization, 15(1).
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821–842. https://doi.org/0/1.101.1717/70/1071070884400661166685354
Griffiths, S. (2012, January). The use of space syntax in historical research: current. practice and future possibilities. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium (Vol. 8193, pp. 1-26). Santiago de Chile: PUC (8193).
Hillier, B. (1996), Space is the machine, A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. (2014). Spatial analysis and cultural information: the need for theory as well as method in space syntax analysis. Spatial analysis and social spaces. https://doi.org/978-3-11-026643-6
Hillier, B., & Grajewski, T. R. (1990). The application of space syntax to work environments inside buildings: Second phase: Towards a predictive model. In Unit for architectural studies. London: The Bartlett School of Architecture and Planning, University College London.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., & Penn, A. (1991). Visible colleges: structure and randomness in the place of discovery. Science in Context, 4, 23-49.
Hogarth, S. (2021, July 21). What is coworking? WeWork Ideas. https://we.co/3Mpi2r8
Howell, T. (2021). Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104447
Koutsolampros, P., Sailer, K., Harlem, R., Austwick, M., & Varoudis, T. (2017). Big data and workplace micro-behaviours: A closer inspection of the social behaviour of eating and interacting. 11th International Space Syntax Symposium.
Koutsolampros, P., Sailer, K., Pomeroy, R., Austwick, M., Hudson-Smith, A., & Harlem, R. (2015). Spatial databases: Generating new insights on office design and human behaviors in the workplace. 10th International Space Syntax Symposium.
Kraus, S., Bouncken, R., Gorman, L., & Gonzalez-Serrano, M. (2022). Coworking spaces and maker spaces: Mapping the state of research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100161
Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge. exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 261-271.
Penn, A., Desyllas, J., & Vaughan, L. (1999). The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1068/b4225
Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (1992). The social potential of buildings: space and the innovative milieu in scientific research laboratories. in Proceedings of the Corporate Space and Architecture Conference, 215-224.
Sailer, K.,&Koutsolampros, P. (2021). Space syntax theory: understanding human movement, co-presence and encounters about spatial structure to the workplace. Routledge handbooks. http://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-21
Sailer, K., Koutsolampros, P., Austwick, M., Varoudis, T., & Hudson-Smith, A. (2016). Measuring interaction in workplaces. Architecture and Interaction: Human-Computer Interaction in Space and Place, 137-161.
Sheng, Q., Wan, D.& Yu, B. (2021). Effect of space configurational attributes on social interactions in urban parks. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13147805
Soltani, S., Gu, N., Ochoa, J. J., & Sivam, A. (2022). The role of spatial configuration in moderating the relationship between social sustainability and urban density. Cities, 121, 103519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103519
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of business and technical communication, 26 (399). https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
Sylvest, M. (2018). Social Interactions in Work Environments: Expanding building evaluation. Building Performance Evaluation (Chapter 12), 155-171. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1-12
Yang, E., & Bisson, C. (2019). Coworking space as a third-fourth place: changing models of a hybrid space in corporate real estate. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. https://doi.org/11.1108/Jeremy-12-2018-0051.
Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user. motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040
Bouncken, R., & Aslam, M. (2021). Bringing the design perspective to coworking spaces: Constitutive entanglement of actors and artefacts. European Management Journal, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.10.008
Bouncken, B., Aslam, M., & Qiu, Y. (2020b). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.bushor.2020.09.010
Bouncken, B., Lapidus, A., & Qui, Y. (2022). Organizational sustainability identity: ‘New Work’ of home offices and coworking spaces as facilitators. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100011
Bouncken, R.& Ratzmann, M.& Barwinski, R.& Kraus, S. (2020a). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03. 033
Bouncken, R., & Reuschl, A. (2018). Coworking spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and entrepreneurship. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
Bueno, S., Rodriguez-Baltanas, G., & Gallegos, M. (2018). Coworking spaces: a new way of achieving productivity. Journal of facilities management. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JFM-01-2018-0006
Butcher, T. (2013, December). Coworking: locating community at work. In Proceedings of the 27th annual australia new zealand academy of management (ANZAM) conference (pp. 1-13).
Gandini, A. (2015). The rush of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: theory& politics in organization, 15(1).
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821–842. https://doi.org/0/1.101.1717/70/1071070884400661166685354
Griffiths, S. (2012, January). The use of space syntax in historical research: current. practice and future possibilities. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium (Vol. 8193, pp. 1-26). Santiago de Chile: PUC (8193).
Hillier, B. (1996), Space is the machine, A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. (2014). Spatial analysis and cultural information: the need for theory as well as method in space syntax analysis. Spatial analysis and social spaces. https://doi.org/978-3-11-026643-6
Hillier, B., & Grajewski, T. R. (1990). The application of space syntax to work environments inside buildings: Second phase: Towards a predictive model. In Unit for architectural studies. London: The Bartlett School of Architecture and Planning, University College London.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., & Penn, A. (1991). Visible colleges: structure and randomness in the place of discovery. Science in Context, 4, 23-49.
Hogarth, S. (2021, July 21). What is coworking? WeWork Ideas. https://we.co/3Mpi2r8
Howell, T. (2021). Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104447
Koutsolampros, P., Sailer, K., Harlem, R., Austwick, M., & Varoudis, T. (2017). Big data and workplace micro-behaviours: A closer inspection of the social behaviour of eating and interacting. 11th International Space Syntax Symposium.
Koutsolampros, P., Sailer, K., Pomeroy, R., Austwick, M., Hudson-Smith, A., & Harlem, R. (2015). Spatial databases: Generating new insights on office design and human behaviors in the workplace. 10th International Space Syntax Symposium.
Kraus, S., Bouncken, R., Gorman, L., & Gonzalez-Serrano, M. (2022). Coworking spaces and maker spaces: Mapping the state of research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100161
Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge. exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13, 261-271.
Penn, A., Desyllas, J., & Vaughan, L. (1999). The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1068/b4225
Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (1992). The social potential of buildings: space and the innovative milieu in scientific research laboratories. in Proceedings of the Corporate Space and Architecture Conference, 215-224.
Sailer, K.,&Koutsolampros, P. (2021). Space syntax theory: understanding human movement, co-presence and encounters about spatial structure to the workplace. Routledge handbooks. http://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-21
Sailer, K., Koutsolampros, P., Austwick, M., Varoudis, T., & Hudson-Smith, A. (2016). Measuring interaction in workplaces. Architecture and Interaction: Human-Computer Interaction in Space and Place, 137-161.
Sheng, Q., Wan, D.& Yu, B. (2021). Effect of space configurational attributes on social interactions in urban parks. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13147805
Soltani, S., Gu, N., Ochoa, J. J., & Sivam, A. (2022). The role of spatial configuration in moderating the relationship between social sustainability and urban density. Cities, 121, 103519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103519
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of business and technical communication, 26 (399). https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
Sylvest, M. (2018). Social Interactions in Work Environments: Expanding building evaluation. Building Performance Evaluation (Chapter 12), 155-171. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1-12
Yang, E., & Bisson, C. (2019). Coworking space as a third-fourth place: changing models of a hybrid space in corporate real estate. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. https://doi.org/11.1108/Jeremy-12-2018-0051.
Published
2023-03-31
How to Cite
ZHIYI, Zhao et al.
The Methodological and Theoretical Application of Space Syntax in Coworking: A Literature Review.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 201-207, mar. 2023.
ISSN 2682-8138.
Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/21992>. Date accessed: 10 dec. 2024.
Section
Articles
