An Investigation into The Role of Network Ties and The Management of Public Primary Schools in Luweero District
Abstract
The study focused on the role of network ties in the management of public primary schools in Luweero district. Three research objectives guided the study thus; (i) To examine headteachers’ perceptions regarding their role in the formation of network ties in public primary schools in Luweero district. (ii) To examine factors influencing the formation of network ties in public primary schools in Luweero district. (iii)To assess the effect of network ties on the management of public primary schools in Luweero district. The study employed a cross-sectional survey design using a mixed methods approach. The study population included education officers at the district headquarters and headteachers in public primary schools in Luweero district. A total of 5 education officers and 210 headteachers participated in the study. The study findings revealed that network ties are an important component in strengthening the management of public primary schools in Luweero district. Headteachers perceived their roles in the formation of network ties essentially as initiating ideas to promote collaborations among schools and sensitizing key stakeholders about the importance of network ties. The major factors influencing the formation of school network ties were mainly geographical proximity and religious affiliation of schools. It was noted that network ties are quite influential in the management of schools because they create an enabling environment for headteachers to acquire additional knowledge and skills as well as other resources needed to improve the performance of schools.
References
Outcomes of Physical Education? A review of Literature; Quest Illinois, National Association for Physical Education in Higher Education 67(1); 56 -72
Coburn, C.E and Russel,J.L (2008). District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks; Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-235
Cresswell, J.W (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd edition); Thousand Oaks, C.A SAGE Publications. Inc.
Felds, S (1982). Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates; American Sociological Review, 797-801
Ibarra, H (1993). Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management; A conceptual Framework, The Academy of Management Review 18(1), 51-87
Ibarra, H and Andrews, S.B (1993). Power, Social Influence and Sense-Making; Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions; Administrative Science Quarterly 38(2) 277-303
Ibarra, H (1995). Race, Opportunity and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3); 673-703
Geier, R., Blumenfield, P., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B and Solo way (2006). Standardised Test outcomes for Students engaged in Inquiry-Based Science Curriculum in the Context of Urban Reform; Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Hadfield, M., Jophing, M., Noden, C., O’Leary, D and Stoff, A (2006). What does the Existing Knowledge Base tell us about the Impact of Networking and Collaboration? A review of Network-based Innovations in Education in the UK. Nottingham, UK; National College for Schol Leadership
Hyman, M.R NMSU and Sierra. J.J (2016). Open-ended versus Close-ended Survey, Business Outlook 14(2).
Jackson, D and Temperley, J (2007). From Professional Learning Community to Networked Learning Community.
Krueger, R.A (1998). Moderating Focus Groups; Thousand Oaks
Kvale, S and SAGE Research Methods online (2008). Doing Interviews; Thousand Oaks; London, SAGE.
Little. J.W (2003). Professional Community and the Problem of High School Reform. International Journal of Educational Research 37(8), 693-714
Little, J.W (2005). Professional Learning and School Network Ties; Prospects for School Improvement. Journal of Educational Change 6, 277-284
Marsden, P.V (1990). Network Diversity Substructure and Opportunity for Contact. In C.Calhoun, M.W. Meyer and W.R Scott (eds.) Structures of Power of Constraint. Papers in Honour of Peter Blau; 397-410, New York,
Maryam, H (2015). Cross-sectional Studies; Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, Geneva.
McNamara, C (1999). General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews; Authenticity Consulting, LLC.
McPherson, J.M, Smith-Lovin, L and Cook, J.M (2001). Birds of a Feather. Homophily in Social Networks; Annual Review of Sociology, 415-44
Moolenaar, N.M., Karsten, S.,Sleegers, P and Daly. J.A (2014). Linking Scial Networks and Trust at Multiple Levels; Examining Dutch Elementary Schools; In Trust and School Life
Mollica, K.A., Gray, B., Trevno, L.K (2003). Racial Homophily and Its Persistence in Newcomers’ Social Networks. Organisation Science, 14(2) 123-136
Monge, P.R AND Contractor, N (2003). Theories of Communication Networks, Oxford; Oxford University Press
O’Leary, Z (2014). The Essential Guide to doing Your Research Project, London, SAGE
Robbinson, G., Gallagher, T., Duffy G and McAneney, H (2020). At the Boundaries; School Networks in Divided Societies; Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(2), 183-197
Saoirse, C.D and Reimers, S (2019). Comparing the use of open and Closed Questions for Continued Effect; Behaviour Research Methods 51, 1426-14440.
Turner, J.C., Onorato, R.S (1998). Tyler, T.R., Kramer, R.M., John, O.P (Eds). Social Identity, Personality and Self Concept; A self Categorisation Perspective. The Psychology of the Social self (26(4); 11-46.
Turner, J.C (2005). Explaining the Nature of Power. A three-process Theory; European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1); 1-22.
Turner, J.C and Reynolds, K.J (2010). The Story of Social Identity. In T.Postmes and N. Branscombe (Eds). Rediscovering Social Identity; Psychology Press, New York, 13-32
Wetzel, C.G and Insko, C.A (1982). The Similarity Attraction Relationship; Is there an Ideal One? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18(3), 253-276).
West, M and Ainscow M (2006). School to School Cooperation as a strategy for School Improvement in Schools in difficult Urban Contexts; Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Geneva; Switzerland.
Wilson, V (1997). Focus Groups; A useful Qualitative Method for Educational Research? British Educational Research Journal 23(2); 209-224, Willey.
Wohlsteller, P., Malloy, C.L., Chau, D and Polhemus, J (2003). Improving Schools through
Networks; A new Approach to Urban Schools’ Reform; Educational Policy 17(4), 399-430
