ESL Teachers Classroom Practices and Beliefs in Malaysian Classroom Context

  • Hema Vanita Kesevan


This study assessed the ideologies and actual classroom and pedagogical practices of teachers. It explored the classroom talk and ideological stance of Malaysian English teachers. The findings of the study revealed there were discrepancy of ideologies and practices among the teachers. Although the divergence can be associated as a reaction to the natural occurrences of classroom context where teachers need to accommodate to the needs of the classroom, the divergence suggests teacher training should be strengthen and greater awareness should be given to avoid greater divergence between ideologies and its actual implementation. Even though the small sample of teachers involved in this study limits generalization of the findings to similar contexts, it still enables to gain an understanding into the factors that differentiate the teachers' classroom ideologies and practices. The purpose of assessing the classroom ideologies and practices teachers is not to determine the best practice or compare the teachers but to understand to what extend the training and experience of a teacher can influence their pedagogical decision that further impact the teaching and learning process.


Ãrva, V., & Medgyes, P. (2000). Native and non-native teachers in the classroom. System, 28(3), 355-372.
Baker, R. M. & Dwyer, F. (2005). Effect of Instructional Strategies and Individual Differences: A Meta-Analytic Assessment. International journal of instructional media, 32(1), 69.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
Chall, J. S. (2000). The Academic Achievement Challenge: What Really Works in the Classroom? New York: The Guilford Press.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in second language acquisition, 28(02), 339-368.
Farimah, G. & Fatimah, H. (2013). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and their English language proficiency: A study of nonnative EFL teachers in selected language centres. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 103, 890-899.
Farahian, M., & Rezaee, M. (2012). A Case Study of an EFL Teacher's Type of Questions: An Investigation into Classroom Interaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 161-167.
Gibson, C. & Swan, A. (2008) In IELTS Research Reports, Vol. 8 Kuala Lumpur.
Jenkins, J. (2005). Implementing an international approach to English pronunciation: The role of teacher attitudes and identity. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 535-543.
Jerome, C., & Samuel, M. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices in Malaysian ESL secondary school classroom. Paper presented in International Conference on Language Studies in Kuching, Sarawak.
Kaanta, L. (2012). Teachers‘ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(2), 166-186.
Kroskrity, P. V. (2010). Language ideologies in evolving perspectives. Society and language use, 7(3), 192-205.
Liao, P. (2007). Teachers‘ beliefs about teaching English to elementary school children. English Teaching & Learning, 31(1), 43-76.
Samad, A.A., & Nurusus, E. (2015). Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs in Teaching Grammar. Malaysian English Language Teaching Journal, 25 (1), 23-32.
Tollefson, J. W. (2000). Policy and ideology in the spread of English. In J. Kelly Hall & W. G. Egginton (Eds.), Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Tsui, A. & Bunton, D. (2000). The discourse and attitudes of English language teachers in Hong Kong. World Englishes, 19(3), 287-303.
Tsui, A. B. & Tollefson, J. W. (2007). Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wing, E. C. (2012). Classroom teaching skills: the research findings of the teacher education project. London: Psychology Press.
How to Cite
VANITA KESEVAN, Hema. ESL Teachers Classroom Practices and Beliefs in Malaysian Classroom Context. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 86-90, dec. 2021. ISSN 2682-8138. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 21 may 2022.