Bibliometric Analysis of Malaysian Authorship: Trends, Patterns, And Prospects

  • Noor Syazwani Ishak Sunway college
  • Mohd Firdaus Roslan Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology
  • Khairul Hafezad Abdullah

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis has emerged as a crucial instrument for interdisciplinary scholars who aim to comprehend the complex terrain of scientific knowledge. The current study employed a bibliometric analysis to scrutinise bibliometric publications by Malaysian authors. The bibliometric datasets utilised in this study were collected from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The obtained datasets were subjected to analysis and visualisation through the utilisation of ScientoPy and VOSviewer. The results suggest that Malaysian authors have actively participated in producing bibliometric papers in both Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Ahmi A. from Universiti Utara Malaysia and Lim W.M. from the Swinburne University of Technology, Sarawak, have published 27 and 25 works, making them the most prolific authors. The terms “CiteSpace”, “artificial intelligence”, “PRISMA”, “machine learning”, “systematic literature review”, “Biblioshiny”, “Bibliographic coupling”, and “performance analysis” have garnered significant attention in academic circles in 2022. This study presented that India and the United Kingdom exhibit parity in co-author affiliations with Malaysian authors. The most commonly employed author keywords by previous researchers were “bibliometric analysis”, “research evaluation”, “scientometrics”, “citation analysis”, and “co-authorship analysis”. Future research endeavours could concentrate on delving deeper into these subjects and scrutinising novel topics and domains of interest in bibliometric analysis.

References

Abdullah, K. H. (2022). Publication Trends in Biology Education: A bibliometric review of 63 years. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 465-480. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/1190
Abdullah, K. H., & Abd Aziz, F. S. (2020), Publication trends of safety knowledge research: a bibliometric. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(4), 927-945. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_14/Iss_4/14460_Abdullah_2020_E_R.pdf
Abdullah, K. H., & Othman, S. Z. (2022). A bibliometric mapping of five decades research in telecommuting. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 20(2), 229-245. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.2.14.9
Abdullah, K. H., & Sofyan, D. (2023). Machine learning in safety and health research: a scientometric analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 21(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2022.1977763.0
Abdullah, K. H., Roslan, M. F., & Ilias, M. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of literature review articles published by malaysian authors. Jurnal Penyelidikan Sains Sosial (JOSSR), 6(18), 8-26. http://www.jossr.com/PDF/JOSSR-2023-18-03-02.pdf
Ciesielski, T. H., Aldrich, M. C., Marsit, C. J., Hiatt, R. A., & Williams, S. M. (2017). Transdisciplinary approaches enhance the production of translational knowledge. Translational research, 182, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2016.11.002
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
González-Alcaide, G., Gorraiz, J., & Hervás Oliver, J. L. (2018). On the use of bibliometric indicators for the analysis of emerging topics and their evolution: Spin-offs as a case study. El profesional de la información, 27(3), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.may.04
La Torre, G., Sciarra, I., Chiappetta, M., & Monteduro, A. (2017). New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama. La Clinica terapeutica, 168(2), e65-e71. https://doi.org/10.7417/ct.2017.1985
Ma, C., Su, H., & Li, H. (2021). Global research trends on prostate diseases and erectile dysfunction: a bibliometric and visualized study. Frontiers in oncology, 10, 627891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.627891
Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Ponomariov, B.L., & Boardman, C. (2016). What is co-authorship? Scientometrics, 109, 1939-1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2127-7
Roslan, M. F., Abd Razak, M. R., Abdullah, K. H., Ishak, N. S., & Dani, R. (2023). A bibliometric perspective of safety awareness research in 48 years. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 3(2), 922-928. https://www.multiresearchjournal.com/arclist.php?list=2023.3.2&id=1117
Roslan, M. Z. H., Sofyan, D., Oluwatoyin, I. M., Rojo, J. R., & Abdullah, K. H. (2022). A scientometric review of disaster education: Does it matter?. Journal of Metrics Studies and Social Science, 1(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmsss.v1i2.241
Ruiz-Rosero, J., Ramírez-González, G., & Viveros-Delgado, J. (2019). Software survey: ScientoPy, a scientometric tool for topics trend analysis in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1165-1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03213-w
Serrano, L., Sianes, A., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2019). Using bibliometric methods to shed light on the concept of sustainable tourism. Sustainability, 11(24), 6964. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246964
Sofian, F. N. R. M., Abdullah, K. H., & Mohd-Sabrun, I. (2023). Research on Corporate Reputation: A Bibliometric Review of 43 Years (1977-2020). International Journal of Information, 21(2), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2023.1977558.0
Sofyan, D., Abdullah, K. H., & Hafiar, H. (2022). The philosophy of sport and physical education: Four decade publication trends via scientometric evaluation. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 22(3), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2022.3.20
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Published
2023-06-01
How to Cite
ISHAK, Noor Syazwani; ROSLAN, Mohd Firdaus; ABDULLAH, Khairul Hafezad. Bibliometric Analysis of Malaysian Authorship: Trends, Patterns, And Prospects. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 33-44, june 2023. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/22302>. Date accessed: 26 mar. 2025.
Section
Articles