Passion Under Constructionism: An Example of Darunsikkhalai School of Innovative Learning

  • Puthyrom Tep
  • Surat Tanprasertkul

Abstract

This article aims to make a conceptual overview pertaining to children’s passion under constructionism with a practical example of Darunsikkhalai School of Innovative Learning. Constructionism, or in simple terms maker education offers a substantial benefit toward children learning. Kids are filled with surging passion to build, play, create, make, imagine, and interact toward artifacts which results in building new knowledge. However, this assertion requires more literature support. The literature review was conducted. The results proposed that children’s passion and engagement were likely encouraged and developed under a constructionist context. In the future, data collection will be conducted in order to test the hypothesis and conceptual perspective in terms of whether passion is improved under constructionism.

References

Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 438-448.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Buechley, L., & Hill, B. M. (2010). LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. Paper presented at the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM.
Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), 436-451. doi:10.10 16/j.ijhcs.2005.04.007
Collective, B. S. M., & Shaw, D. (2012). Makey Makey: improvising tangible and naturebased user interfaces. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, ACM.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725
Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling: Psychology Press.
Grothaug, H. E. (2011). A Software Roadmap for a FabLab Network. (Master’s thesis). Royal Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Communication, Stockholm, Sweden,
Harvey, B., Garcia, D., Paley, J., & Segars, L. (2012). Snap!:(build your own blocks). Paper presented at the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM.
Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A. (2001). Constructivism in Practice: A Comparison and Contrast of Apprenticeship and Constructionist Learning Environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 281-322. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1003_3
Jacobs, J., Resnick, M., & Buechley, L. (2014). Dresscode: supporting youth in computational design and making. Paper presented at the 3rd International Constructionism Conference 2014, Vienna: Austrian Computer Society.
Jarusrose, C., & Singhasiri, W. (2015). Novice Teacher’s Learning Through a Project-Based Learning Class. rEFLections, 19(0), 17-37.
Jitgarun, K., Thaweesin, S., Vitthayaporn, N., Chunkul, C., & Tongsakul, A. (2006). A Study of Project-Based Learning through Learning Tools: A Case Study
of Darunsikkhalai School. Paper presented at the APERA Conference 2006, Hong Kong.
Kafai, Y. B. (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Mahwah: Routledge.
Katterfeldt, E.-S., Dittert, N., & Schelhowe, H. (2015). Designing digital fabrication learning environments for Bildung: Implications from ten years of physical computing workshops. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 3-10. doi:10.1016/ j.ijcci.2015.08.001
Kynigos, C., Moustaki, F., Smyrnaiou, R., & Xenos, M. (2014). Half-baked microworlds as expressive media for fostering creative mathematical thinking. Paper presented at the 3rd International Constructionism Conference 2014 Vienna: Austrian Computer Society.
Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L. (2005). Creating and Sustaining the Constructivist Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Morrison, K. (2009). Educational Innovation in Thailand: A Case Study. International Education, 38(2).
Morrison, K. (2010). Complexities of a maintenance bilingual program: a Thai case study. International Schools Journal, 30(1), 46-56.
New York Hall of Science. (2013). A blueprint: Maker programs for youth. New York, NY: Author. http://dmp.nysci.org/system/files/filedepot/1/NYSCI_MAKER_BLUE PRINT.pdf
Papert, S. A. (1984). New Theories for New Learnings. School Psychology Review, 13(4), 422-428. doi:10.1080/02796015.1984.12085122
Papert, S. A. (1987). A new opportunity for science education: NSF Grant Application.
Papert, S. A. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood N.J: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Papert, S. A. (1993). The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York: BasicBooks.
Papert, S. A. (2020). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas: Hachette UK.
Pausch, R., Burnette, T., Capeheart, A. C., Conway, M., Cosgrove, D., DeLine, R., . . . White, J. (1995). Alice: rapid prototyping system for virtual reality: IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., . . . Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM, 52(11), 60–67. doi:10.114 5/1592761.1592779
Resnick, M., & Robinson, K. (2017). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity Through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play: MIT Press.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, Learning, and Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136
Slany, W. (2014). Pocket code: a scratch-like integrated development environment for your phone. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the companion publication of the 2014 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity, ACM.
Stager, G. S. (2001). Constructionism as a High-Tech Intervention Strategy for At-Risk Learners. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the National Education Computing Conference, Chicago, IL.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006). A Development of Portfolio for Learning Assessment of Students Taught by Full-Scale Constructionism Approach at Darunsikklialai School. Research in the Schools, 13(2), 24-36.
The Fab Lab Network, F. i. (2022). Labs: FabLabs. Retrieved from https://www.fablabs.io/labs
Vallerand, R. J. (2012). From motivation to passion: In search of the motivational processes involved in a meaningful life. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 53(1), 42–52. doi:10.1037/a0026377
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., . . . Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l'âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756–767. doi:10.1037/0022-3514. 85.4.756
Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood N.J: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Published
2022-06-01
How to Cite
TEP, Puthyrom; TANPRASERTKUL, Surat. Passion Under Constructionism: An Example of Darunsikkhalai School of Innovative Learning. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 50-58, june 2022. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/18348>. Date accessed: 26 sep. 2022.
Section
Articles