Linguistic Landscape in Tanjungbalai

  • Rita Meutia
  • Bambang Gulyanto

Abstract

This study investigated the texts used in public spaces in Tanjungbalai, North Sumatera, Indonesia. From 182 signboards analyzed, it was found that the items in the bottom-up category had a large number than in the top-down category. This finding approved that shop notes, private business notes, and private broadcasts dominated the Tanjungbalai’s linguistic landscape. The texts used in top-down and bottom-up categories were monolingual (using BI/FL/LL) and bilingual (using BI and FL/ BI and LL/ FL and LL). In terms of monolingualism, BI was dominantly used in both categories. In the top-down category, BI was used in 19 nameplates of public institutions, 7 public notes of common interest, and 11 public broadcasts. In the bottom-up category, BI was used in 46 shop notes, 11 private business notes, and 16 private broadcasts. However, LL had the least number in use. It was merely used in 1 public broadcast and 2 shop notes. In terms of bilingualism, in the top-down category, bilingualism was only found in public broadcasts while in the bottom-up category, it was found in all types of items. Public broadcasts in Tanjungbalai combined BI with LL. Such combination will allow a culturally diverse society to comprehend the information provided by state and local government. In the bottom-up category, BI and FL were the major combinations identified (found in 15 shop signs, 2 private business signs, and 14 private announcements), followed by FL and LL combination (found in 3 shop signs), and BI and LL combination (found in 1 shop sign). Low LL usage in all categories (top-down, bottom-up, monolingual, and bilingual) indicated the failure of local government to promote LL and the potential for the death of LL. This study, then, can be a self-reflection for the local government in Tanjungbalai to redesign language policy and planning.

References

Backhaus, P. (2007). Signs of Multilingualism in Tokyo — A Diachronic Look at the Linguistic Landscape, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 175/176, 103-121.
Ben Rafael et al., (2006). Linguistic Landscape as Symbolic Construction of the Public Space: The Case of Israel. The International Journal of Multilingualism (3), 7-30.
Blackwood, R., and S. Tufi. (2012). Policies vs Non-policies: Analysing Regional Languages and the National Standard in the Linguistic Landscape of French and Italian Mediterranean Cities. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Coupland, N. (2010). Welsh Linguistic Landscapes “From above” and “From below.”: Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, 77– 101. London: Continuum
Fajar, Y., & Ardhian, D. (2017). Linguistic landscape in Malang City, East Java. Journal of English Teaching as a Foreign Language, 25-42.
Fleitas, J. (2003). The Power of Words: Examining the Linguistic Landscape of Pediatric Nursing. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 28 (6), 384-388.
Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. The International Journal of Multilingualism 3 (special issue).
Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2007). Knowledge about Language and Linguistic Landscape. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd Revised Edition. Berlin: Springer Science.
Gorter, D. (2012). Foreword: Signposts in the Linguistic Landscape. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hélot, C., M. Barni, R. Janssens, and C. Bagna. (eds.). (2012). Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism, and Social Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hong, L.S., Muhammad, Z.M.R., dan Goh, K.R.A. (2013). Linguistic Landscape in Changi Airport. Student Paper: Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University.
Huebner, T. (2006). Bangkok’s Linguistic Landscapes: Environmental Print, Code Mixing, and Language Change. The International Journal of Multilingualism 3, 31-51.
Hult, F.M. (2014). Drive-thru Linguistic Landscaping: Constructing a Linguistically Dominant Place in a Bilingual Space. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 507-523.
Hult, F.M. (2009). Language Ecology and Linguistic Landscape Analysis. London: Routledge.
Kasanga, Luanga Adrien (2012). Mapping the Linguistic Landscape of a Commercial Neighbourhood in Central Phnom Penh. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 32 (6): 1–15.
Kreslins, J. (2003). Linguistic Landscapes in the Baltic. Scandinavian Journal of History 28 (34), 165-174.
Labov, W., Ash, S. and Boberg, C. (1997). A National Map of The Regional Dialects of American English. www.ling.upenn.edu/phonoatlas/NationalMap/
Landry, R. and Bourhis, R.Y. (1997) Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16, 23-49.
Jaworski, A., and C. Thurlow. (2010). Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.
Jam, Blommaert. 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Multilingual Matters.
Peck, A., and C. Stroud. (2015). Skinscapes-Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal 1(12), 133–151.
Pennycook, A. (2010). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.
Ramamoorthy, L. (2002). Linguistic Landscaping and Reminiscences of French Legacy: The Case of Pondicherry. In N.H. Itagy and S.K. Singh (eds) Linguistic Landscaping in India, 118–131. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages/Mahatma Gandhi International Hindi University.
Sciriha, L. and Vassallo, M. (2001). Malta: A Linguistic Landscape. Malta: University of Malta.
Shohamy, E, Ben-Rafael, E and Barni, M. (2010). Linguistic Landscape in the City. Multilingual Matters.
Siebetcheu, R. (2016). Semiotic and Linguistic Analysis of Banners in Three European Countries’ Football Stadia: Italy, France, and England.” In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza, and H. Woldemariam (eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes. London: Continuum.
Stroud, C. (2009). Towards a Material Ethnography of Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Mobility, and Space in a South African Township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363-386.
Vandenbroucke, M. (2010). Multilingual Landscapes and Ethnolinguistic Vitality in the Case of Brussels-Capital: An empirical Study. MA dissertation. Ghent: Ghent University.
Van Mensel, L., and J. Darquennes. (2012). All Is Quiet on the Eastern Front? Language Contact along the French-German Language Border in Belgium.” In D. Gorter, H. F. Marten, and L. Van Mensel (eds.), Minority Languages in the Linguistic Landscape. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wanting, N., dan Samantha, S.S.M. (2013). Singapore's Linguistic Landscape: A Comparison between Food Centres Located in Central and Heartland Singapore. Student Paper: Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University.
Published
2022-04-01
How to Cite
MEUTIA, Rita; GULYANTO, Bambang. Linguistic Landscape in Tanjungbalai. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 176-185, apr. 2022. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/17851>. Date accessed: 04 july 2022.
Section
Articles