The Use of C.A.R.E. Method to Foster Students' Engagement and Motivation to Learn in an Online Undergraduate Accounting

  • Chorng Yuan Fung
  • Sueh Ing Su

Abstract

Academic staff members often face problems of student disengagement when teaching online. Disengaged students are usually not motivated to learn and have unsatisfactory academic achievement. Using Design-based research methodology, this study explained the use of C.A.R.E. (contextualisation, application, reflection and evaluation) method to teach an online undergraduate Accounting subject. The subject was a final Year subject of a three-year business degree programme. 86 students have attempted this subject. C.A.R.E. method was designed using situated learning theory. Contextualisation of content knowledge was achieved through a YouTube video series called 'Classroom in the World'. The videos showed the application of the content knowledge in a specific context. Application of the content knowledge was achieved through group discussions during online tutorial classes, using case study questions. Students were then asked to write reflective journals to reflect on their learning experience at the end of the semester. The final assessment task was an open-book case study, examining the application of the content knowledge in a business context. A review from the students' feedback at the end of the semester showed that the video series was helpful to engage, motivate and help them understand and apply the content knowledge to context. The average marks of the final assessment as well as data from learning analytics of two semesters were compared. There was a 13% increase in the average final assessment marks over the previous semester. Learning analytics showed a 29% increase in the weekly average page viewed and 61% increase in the weekly average number of participations. This study has demonstrated that C.A.R.E. method has helped foster student engagement, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. This study provides valuable insight into the application of C.A.R.E. method to support academic staff members to design online courses that are engaging and motivating to the students.


 

References

Abell, S.K. (2008). Twenty years later: does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?. International Journal of Science Education. 30(10). 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?. Educational researcher, 41(1), 16-25. doi:10.3102%2F0013189X11428813
Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), 38-43. doi:10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boyd, J., & Pitre, R. (2020). Creating relevance in managerial accounting. Journal of Education for Business, 95(5), 331-334. doi:10.1080/08832323.2019.1646699
Buckingham Shum, S., & Crick, R. D. (2016). Learning Analytics for 21st Century Competencies. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 6-21. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126768
Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. (2001, January). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and ALN. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 10-pp). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2001.926183
Dimitrios, B., Labros, S., Nikolaos, K., Koutiva, M., & Athanasios, K. (2013). Traditional teaching methods vs. teaching through the application of information and communication technologies in the accounting field: Quo Vadis?. European Scientific Journal, 9(28). 73-101. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.838.417&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Edge, W. D., & Loegering, J. P. (2000). Distance education: Expanding learning opportunities. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 522–533. Retrieved from https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/distance-education-expanding-learning-opportunities
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi:10.3102%2F00346543074001059
Fletcher, A. (2015). Defining Student Engagement: A Literature Review. Soundout: Promoting Meaningful Student Involvement, Student Voice and Student Engagement. Retrieved from https://soundout.org/defining-student-engagement-a-literature-review/.
Fung, C.Y., Abdullah, M.N.L.Y. & Hashim, S. (2019). Improving Self-regulated Learning through personalised weekly e-Learning Journals: a time series quasi-experimental study. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarly of Teaching. 13(1). Pp: 30-45. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2261002664?pq-origsite=gscholar
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 304-317. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
Jill, M. D., Wang, D., & Mattia, A. (2019). Are instructor generated YouTube videos effective in accounting classes? A study of student performance, engagement, motivation, and perception. Journal of Accounting Education, 47, 63-74. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.02.002
Juan, A. A., Steegman, C., Huertas, A., Martinez, M. J., & Simosa, J. (2011). Teaching mathematics online in the European area of higher education: An instructor's point of view. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42, 141–153. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2010.526254
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0047239516661713
Koole, M. (2014). Identity and the itinerant online learner. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance learning, 15, 52–70. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1879
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New directions for institutional research, 2009(141), 5-20. Retrieved from https://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/Kuh_2009_NSSE_Conceptual_and_Empirical_Foundations23689.pdf
Kushniroff, M. C. (2012). Where Do We Go to Ensure the Continuation of Accounting Education?. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 12(4), 110-122. Retrieved from http://www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/kushniroff_abstract.html
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp.3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leite, C., Fernandes, P., & Figueiredo, C. (2018). Challenges of curricular contextualisation: teachers’ perspectives. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(4), 435-453. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0271-1
Mandernach, B.J. (2015). Assessment of student engagement in higher education: a synthesis of literature and assessment tools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 12(2). Retrieved from http://mail.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/367
McInnery, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7, 73–81. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.7.3.73
McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: Multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 5–17). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: the complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education. 30(10). 1281–1299. doi:10.1080/09500690802186993
Orgill, M. (2007). Situated cognition. In G. M. Bodner & M. Orgill (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education (pp. 187–203). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98-110. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
Worsley, M. (2018, March). (Dis) engagement matters: Identifying efficacious learning practices with multimodal learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 365-369). doi:10.1145/3170358.3170420
Published
2021-03-01
How to Cite
YUAN FUNG, Chorng; ING SU, Sueh. The Use of C.A.R.E. Method to Foster Students' Engagement and Motivation to Learn in an Online Undergraduate Accounting. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 94-104, mar. 2021. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/12528>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2021.
Section
Articles