Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Smart Learning: A Case of a Malaysian University

  • Lilian A.


In any smart city construction, smart learning is essential. However, limited studies are found in smart learning in smart cities. A smart city must develop 21st-century skills to promote smart learning. Self-regulation has been noted as one of the vital 21st-century competencies to foster smart learning as it helps individuals master their learning process. The purpose of this paper is to provide a descriptive analysis of the use of self-regulated learning strategies (SRLS) in digital learning. This paper can provide a clearer picture of conducting future studies on smart learning in a smart city.


Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014).A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32.
Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. H. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17.
Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337–346.
Cyberview Sdn Bhd (2016). Smart Living is a Life Fulfilled: Smart City Framework. Retrieved from
European Union (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. 2006/962/EC. Official Journal of the European Union.
Hall, R.E., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H. (2000). The vision of a smart city. 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, 28.
Haron, H. N., Harun, H., Ali, R., Salim, K. R., & Hussain, N. H. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies between the performing and non-performing students in statics. Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2014, (December), 802–805.
Hashemyolia, S., Asmuni, A., Ayub, A. F. M., Daud, S. M., & Shah, J. A. (2015). Motivation to Use Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Learning Management System amongst Science and Social Science Undergraduates. Asian Social Science, 11(3).
Huang, R., Zhuang, R., & Yang, J. (2017). Promoting Citizen’s Learning Experience in Smart Cities, 10309, 15–25.
Huang, R., Yang, J., Hu, Y.: From digital to smart: the evolution and trends of the learning environment. Open Educ. Res. 1, 75–84 (2012)
Kuhn, P. & M.C. Villeval (2011). European Workshop on Experimental and Behavioral Economics
Ljiljana, M., and Adam, S. (2015). Building a gamified system for capturing MOOC related data: smart city learning community as its most precious source of intangible cultural heritage. International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture Computing), 175–182.
Mat Saad, M.I., Eng Tek, O., and Baharom.S.(2009). Self-regulated learning: Gender differences in motivation and learning strategies amongst Malaysian science students. 1st International Conference on Educational Research
Norman, E., & Furnes, B. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: Is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media? Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 301–309.
OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012. Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD
OECD. (2013b). Skilled for Life? Key findings from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (6), 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801,813.
Tas (2016). The contribution of perceived classroom learning environment and motivation to student engagement in science. European Journal of Psychology Education, 31, 1–21.
Tang, C.M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? The Electronic Journal of e‐Learning, 14(1), 54-65.
Wolters, C. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250.
Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,329–339.
Zimmerman, B. J., and Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
How to Cite
A., Lilian. Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Smart Learning: A Case of a Malaysian University. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 72-83, mar. 2021. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2021.