The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Corporate Risk and ESG Performance as Moderating Variable

  • Ramadhian Scholars Ekaputra
  • Debi Nur Afifah
  • Edwin Bakken

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on corporate Risk proxied as total Risk, Systematic Risk, and nonsystematic Risk (idiosyncratic) with ESG performance (environmental, social, and governance) as a moderating variable. This study took a sample of companies listed on the IDX in the Kompas100 index from 2018 to 2020. The results of this test show a positive influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on corporate Risk as measured by total Risk, Systematic Risk, and nonsystematic Risk. Then this test shows that ESG performance, both in combination and components, namely environmental performance (E) and governance performance (G), is proven to significantly weaken the positive relationship of the Covid-19 pandemic to total Risk and Systematic Risk, but insignificant to the company's nonsystematic Risk. In the ESG component, environmental performance (E) has the best coefficient and significantly weakens the positive relationship of the Covid-19 pandemic to all three risks, namely total Risk, Systematic Risk, and nonsystematic Risk. However, only social performance (S) was found to be insignificant in this study, weakening the relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

References

Hunjra, A. I., Mehmood, R., & Tayachi, T. (2020). How Do Coporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance Affect Stock Price Crash Risk? Risk Financial Management.
Kumar, N. C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., & Tavares, R. (2016). ESG Factors and Risk-Adjusted Performance: A New Quantitative Model. Journal of Sustainability Finance & Investment, 292-300.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. (2009). The Debate Over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Marketing, 198-213.
Miralles-quir, M., Miralles-quir, L., Miguel, L., & Gon, V. (2018). The Value Relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Brazilian Case. Sustainability, 574.
Mohammad, W. W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, Volume 2, 100015.
Orlitszky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review. Sage Publications, 369-396. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary
Environmental Disclosure Quality and Firm Value: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 336-361.
Prawoto, N., Purnomo, E. P., & Zahra, A. A. (2020). The Impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic on Socio-Economic Mobility in Indonesia. International
Journal of Economics and Business Administration, VII(3), 57-71. Sassen, R., Hardeck, I., & Hinze, A.-K. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm Risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics.
Uyar, U., & Uyar Kanggalli, S. G. (2022). The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Systematic Risk of S&P 500 Sectors: A Wavelet Power Spectrum analysis. EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 59-74.
Published
2023-03-01
How to Cite
EKAPUTRA, Ramadhian Scholars; AFIFAH, Debi Nur; BAKKEN, Edwin. The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Corporate Risk and ESG Performance as Moderating Variable. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 149-157, mar. 2023. Available at: <https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajrbm/article/view/21604>. Date accessed: 16 apr. 2024.
Section
Articles