• Nor Atifah Mohamad Lecturer of Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, UiTM Cawangan Melaka, Kampus Alor Gajah
  • Normah Abdullah Associate Professor of Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, UiTM Shah Alam, Selangor
  • S. Salahudin Suyurno Associate Professor of Akademi Pengajian Islam Kontemporari, UiTM Cawangan Melaka, Kampus Alor Gajah


This concept paper explores the online persuasion in the light of Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and the Islamic communication principles. According to ELM persuasion happens between one of the two routes; the central route and peripheral route that lead to behavioural change. Central route processing depends on the strength of the argument or the logical processing of the information whereas peripheral route depends on the contextual clues or other seemingly unimportant cues. As for the Islamic communication principles, this paper presents the two main principles of Islamic communication which are the tawhidic principle and the doctrine of ma’ruf and munkar and the six Islamic ethics of conversation. Thus, this paper suggests the use of Islamic values and elements together with the two routes of persuasion postulated by ELM in order to create the persuasion process that is permissible from Islamic context. These insights may shed new research direction in term of online persuasion as the proposed framework may further develop the online persuasion that suits the Muslim community.


Abbas, N., & Ezhar, T. (2012). Impact of Islamic religious symbols in producing
favourable attitude toward advertisement. The Public Administration and
Social Policies Review, 1 (8), 61-77.
Bawazir, M. A., Mahmud, M., Molok, M. N. A. & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Persuasive
technology for improving information security awareness and behaviour:
Literature review. International Conference on Information and
Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 2016 6th
International Conference, 228-232.
Blanco, C. F., Sarasa, R. G, & Sanclemente, C. O. (2010). Effects of visual and
textual information in online product presentations: Looking for the best
combination in website design. European Journal of Information System,
19(6), 668-686.
Borchers, T. A. (2013). Persuasion in the Media Age. 3
rd ed. Illinois: Waveland
Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E. (2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation
hypothesis. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 69-118.
Chaiken, S. (1980), “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing in the
Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 39, 752–66.
Cyr, D., Head, M., Lim, E. & Stibe, A. (2018). Using the elaboration likelihood
model to examine online persuasion through website. Information and
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we
think and do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Hamid, M. (1989). Communication, Ethics and the Islamic tradition. In Thomas W.
Cooper et al. (eds.), Communication Ethics and Global Changes. New
York: Longman.
Haugtvedt, C. P. and Petty, R. E. (1989). Need for cognition and attitude
persistence. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 33-36.
Hogan, J. M. (2012). Persuasion in rhetorical tradition. The Sage handbook of
Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice.
Ibrahim, A. N. (1984). Islamic information and the media. Paper presented at the
rd International Seminar of Islamic Thought, Kuala Lumpur.
Johnson, T. M., and Scoggins, D. R. (2005). Christian missions and Islamic da’wah:
A preliminary quantitative assessment. International Bulletin of Missionary
Research, 29 (1), 8-11.
Kaptein, M. & Eckles, D. (2012) Heterogeneity in the effects of online persuasion.
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(3), 176-188.
Khairiah, A. R. (2016). Dialogue and persuasion in the Islamic tradition:
implications for journalism, Global Media Journal- Canadian Edition, 9,
22, 9-26.
Larson, C. U. (2010). Persuasion: Reception and responsibility. 12th ed. Boston:
Mohd Khairie, A., & Harrison, J. (2007). Untapped potential: cultural sensitivityIslamic persuasive communication in health promotion programs. Paper
presented at the Global Communication and Development Conference, 16-
21 October, Shanghai. Retrieved, February 11, 2019 from
Motavali, K. (2005). Public opinion and persuasion techniques. Bahjat Press:
Norhafezah, Y., Rosna A. H., Mohd Azizudin M. S, Syarizan D. & Romlah, R.
(2018). Exploring religion based persuasive factors to rationalize violence
among Muslim youth in Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences and
Humanities, 15, 5 p. 66-78.
Nyang, S. S. (1988). Islam and technological change in the modern world. Muslim
Education Quarterly, 6 (1). 1-23.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). The role of affect in
Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In Donohew, L., Sypher, H.
& Higgins, E. (Eds.). (2015). Communication, Social Cognition, and Affect
(PLE: Emotion). London: Psychology Press
Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Blitzer, G. Y., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The
elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Seiter, J. S. & Gass, R. H.
(Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance
gaining. Boston:Pearson.
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C. and Tormala Z. L. (2003). Persuasion and attitude
change. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology:
Volume 5: Personality and social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Issue involvement as a moderator of the
effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in
Consumer Research, 27, 21-35.
Petty, R & Hinsenkamp, L. (2017). Routes to persuasion, central and peripheral.
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T. & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change.
Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647.
Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Increasing the effectiveness of
communications to consumers: Recommendations based on elaboration
likelihood and attitude certainty perspectives. Journal of Public Policy and
Marketing, 25(1), 39-52.
SanJosé-Cabezudo, R., Gutiérrez-Arranz, A. M. & Gutiérrez-Cillán, J. (2009). The
combined influence of central and peripheral routes in the online persuasion
process. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 12(3), 299-308.
Shaikh, K. M. (2000). Da’wah in Modern Times. Karachi, Pakistan: Royal Book
Simons, H.W., Morreale, J. and Gronbeck B. (2001), Persuasion in Society, Sage
Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks.
Stiff, J. B. (1993). Persuasive Communication. New York: Guilford
Sussman, S.W. & Siegal, W.S. (2003). Informational Influence in Organizations:
An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption. Information Systems
Research, 14(1), 47-65
Tengku Mohd Azzman Shariffadeen (1992). Information technology and the
Malaysian development paradigm. In Kongres Menjelang Abad 21. Islam
dan Wawasan 2020. Kuala Lumpur IKIM.
Wagner, B. C, & Petty, R.E. (2011). The elaboration likelihood model of
persuasion: Thoughtful and non-thoughtful social influence. In D. Chadee
(Ed.), Theories in social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zulkiple, A. G. & Mohd Safar, H. (2004). Islamic values and ethics in
communication. Islamiyyat, 25(1), p. 61-64.
How to Cite
MOHAMAD, Nor Atifah; ABDULLAH, Normah; SUYURNO, S. Salahudin. THE USE OF THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL AND ISLAMIC PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION FOR ONLINE PERSUASION. E-Journal of Islamic Thought & Understanding (E-JITU), [S.l.], v. 2, p. 83-95, mar. 2021. ISSN 2600-9617. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 21 apr. 2021.